08 — Allocation and reporting
Portfolio, allocation and reporting systems for private banks, family offices and discretionary managers.
Wealth platforms are judged on reporting, not on trading. A client who cannot get a consolidated, correct position across every asset class they hold will leave regardless of performance, and consolidation is genuinely hard when holdings span custodians, private markets and digital assets.
We build the position and performance engine, the data pipelines that normalise across custodians and asset classes, the mandate and suitability controls, and reporting that reconciles rather than approximates.
Common questions
Why is consolidated reporting so difficult across custodians?
Because custodians disagree on identifiers, valuation timing, corporate action treatment and cash classification. Consolidation is not a data-loading problem; it is a normalisation and reconciliation problem, and the difference between approximating and reconciling is what clients notice.
How are digital assets incorporated into a wealth platform?
As another asset class with its own custody, valuation and tax treatment, not as a separate product. That means a valuation source with a documented methodology, custody evidence that satisfies the same controls as any other holding, and inclusion in the same performance and reporting stack.
What controls does a discretionary mandate require?
Restriction enforcement before order generation, suitability checks against the client profile, concentration and liquidity limits, and an audit trail showing why each decision was permitted. Controls applied after execution are a reporting exercise, not a control.
Next capability
AI financial products
Bring us the hard part.
Forty-five minutes with the people who would actually run the build.